LuoboliDigital wellbeing
中文EN

DIGITAL WELLBEING RESEARCH

Researching digital wellbeing.
Understanding human experience.

Luoboli is an independent laboratory focused on digital wellbeing research. We examine digital content and interactive experiences from around the world, read original studies, and explore emotional support, self-understanding and everyday relationships. Findings, limitations and open questions are presented separately.

Read research Our methods →

RESEARCH READING

Specific questions. A clearer view of digital wellbeing.

Explore research from around the world, with questions, methods, findings and limitations made clear, including different results and unresolved questions.

All research
Engagement and everyday practice

Beyond app use: does mindfulness practice become part of daily life?

A US college trial measured app use separately from everyday practice and perceived skills. Orientation groups used the app more and reported some more favorable outcomes, but use, learning and changes in health need their own evidence.

Game-based interventions and implementation

When a mental health game enters schools, delivery matters too

A randomized SPARX trial involving 134 Australian schools and 6388 students found no added reduction in depressive symptoms at 12 months. Twenty-two percent completed at least four modules; 12% completed all seven. Digital content needs evaluation alongside engagement, delivery conditions and the people it is intended to support.

Immersion and relaxation

Does feeling more immersed mean feeling more relaxed? A VR beach experiment

One hundred adults listened to the same breathing meditation with audio alone, a beach on a monitor, or a 360° VR beach. VR increased presence, but did not establish an added relaxation benefit. Immersive wellbeing experiences need separate tests of presentation, immediate experience and change over time.

Interactive narratives and experience evaluation

How can an interactive story respond to the person using it?

A four-week, 26-person Betwixt user-experience study offers clues about stories, pauses and responses. Relevance, participation and later changes need separate evaluation; immersion and liking do not establish efficacy.

Evaluating bedtime experiences

What can bedtime sound offer? From experience to outcome evaluation

In a four-week randomized trial of 495 adults, reported sleep disturbance improved in bedtime-audio and same-app daily-content groups, without clear additional benefit of bedtime audio on the primary outcome. Digital wellbeing evaluation needs a clear aim, comparison, and outcome.

Immediate and sustained support

How long can digital companionship help? From a moment to daily life

A seven-day experiment observed lower momentary loneliness after chatting, but no sustained advantage over the comparison group before each day’s chat. Immediate support has value; digital wellbeing research should distinguish within-session, between-session, and post-use change.

Trust and understanding roles

Trust in digital wellbeing: evaluating closeness alongside reliability

Human-like expression can affect immediate trust and responsibility judgments without establishing greater reliability. Digital wellbeing research should consider perceived closeness, actual performance, and whether people understand the system’s role and accountability.

Emotional support

Feeling heard: what emotional support can an AI response offer?

Feeling understood is one starting point for digital wellbeing research. An experiment with 455 participants separated response content from source labels; the resulting immediate experience should be evaluated separately from lasting psychological change.

Trust and autonomy

Between empathy and agreement: leaving room to reflect

A comforting response can also reinforce a one-sided judgment. Research on AI sycophancy suggests evaluating emotional support alongside reflection, autonomy, and willingness to repair relationships.

Companionship and connection

AI companionship in everyday life: support, relationships, and context

A survey of 1,131 users examined AI use alongside offline social context. Primarily using AI for companionship was associated with lower wellbeing; understanding that association requires attention to patterns of use and individual circumstances.

Evaluating sustained experience

Life after digital companionship: lessons from a four-week experiment

A four-week experiment with 981 participants detected no significant effects of assigned chat modes or topics. Greater voluntary use was associated with worse psychosocial outcomes, highlighting the need to distinguish experimental comparisons from behavioral associations.

Stories and self-understanding

Autonomy in interactive stories: what meaningful choices change

In a small game study, older adults with control over key story decisions reported greater autonomy and interest, alongside greater tension. Digital wellbeing research should distinguish these outcomes and examine whether changes continue beyond the experience.

Research and evaluation methods

Evaluating emotional support: from satisfaction to sustained change

Evaluation should consider empathy, judgment, autonomy, and what follows a conversation. This article proposes a research approach informed by public studies, distinguishing methodological suggestions from established findings.

Product insights Team surveys Glossary

RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

A global view.
Specific people and contexts.

Emotional support

Explore digital responses, listening and expression, distinguishing immediate feelings of being understood from sustained change.

Self-understanding and agency

Read research on interactive stories, games and choice, considering reflection and voluntary participation.

Companionship and connection

Place digital companionship within everyday life, examining trust, attachment and relationships beyond the interaction.

Immersion and evaluation

Examine sound, natural settings and VR, considering participation, outcomes and the contexts to which findings apply.

About the laboratory

OUR METHODS

Make the evidence behind each judgment clear.

Link original sources and explain samples, comparisons and limitations. Separate findings, the authors’ explanations and our interpretation, and disclose AI involvement and relevant interests.

Explore our methods

GLOBAL OBSERVATIONS

Different formats. Shared research questions.

Observe how interactive stories, audio content, AI conversations and immersive settings organize content and interaction. Product descriptions and outcome evidence are examined separately; this is not an efficacy ranking.

View global product observations

STAY CONNECTED

Keep building the discussion around digital wellbeing.

Follow research commentary, methods and global product observations, with attention to questions that deserve further study.

Follow research updates